<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stronger communities, better comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsnext.ca/2010/04/stronger-communities-better-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsnext.ca/2010/04/stronger-communities-better-comments/</link>
	<description>Notes on teaching, technology &#38; online news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Costas Halavrezos</title>
		<link>http://newsnext.ca/2010/04/stronger-communities-better-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Costas Halavrezos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsnext.ca/?p=341#comment-63</guid>
		<description>The &quot;broken windows&quot; in the Comments clearly devalue the online neighbourhood created by news organizations. Maritime Noon callers have mentioned (on the 2 occasions we&#039;ve explored this topic)that the Comments on CBC sites rarely add to civil public discourse and are much more likely to range from the inane to the offensive - in sharp contrast with the other editorial content. Dan Leger&#039;s article today alludes to the staffing issue (i.e.with skeleton crews for newsgathering &amp; editing, can you afford a full-time Comments Editor ?). Question: would people stop reading online sites if they couldn&#039;t post Comments ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;broken windows&#8221; in the Comments clearly devalue the online neighbourhood created by news organizations. Maritime Noon callers have mentioned (on the 2 occasions we&#8217;ve explored this topic)that the Comments on CBC sites rarely add to civil public discourse and are much more likely to range from the inane to the offensive &#8211; in sharp contrast with the other editorial content. Dan Leger&#8217;s article today alludes to the staffing issue (i.e.with skeleton crews for newsgathering &amp; editing, can you afford a full-time Comments Editor ?). Question: would people stop reading online sites if they couldn&#8217;t post Comments ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Leger</title>
		<link>http://newsnext.ca/2010/04/stronger-communities-better-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Leger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsnext.ca/?p=341#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Tim, thanks. I would add that even with registration and filters, the Herald will likely continue comment moderation. We are also very interested in this notion of &quot;trusted users&quot; or &quot;starred commenters&quot; who should be able to interact with little or no supervision while the trolls are shunted aside to abuse and bully each other in peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, thanks. I would add that even with registration and filters, the Herald will likely continue comment moderation. We are also very interested in this notion of &#8220;trusted users&#8221; or &#8220;starred commenters&#8221; who should be able to interact with little or no supervision while the trolls are shunted aside to abuse and bully each other in peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owens</title>
		<link>http://newsnext.ca/2010/04/stronger-communities-better-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsnext.ca/?p=341#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention and link.

Call me arrogant, but I&#039;m confident I could make the policy and enforcement scale to any size site. A bigger site would require a bigger investment, but it could be done, and it wouldn&#039;t cost that much, relatively speaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention and link.</p>
<p>Call me arrogant, but I&#8217;m confident I could make the policy and enforcement scale to any size site. A bigger site would require a bigger investment, but it could be done, and it wouldn&#8217;t cost that much, relatively speaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles (Webconomist)</title>
		<link>http://newsnext.ca/2010/04/stronger-communities-better-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles (Webconomist)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsnext.ca/?p=341#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Great article Tim. I too like Gawkers approach and I suspect that much like YouTube and the rating systems, it will be &quot;users&quot; who will determine the junk and can push it to obscurity. That doesn&#039;t solve the anonymity issue but helps control the junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Tim. I too like Gawkers approach and I suspect that much like YouTube and the rating systems, it will be &#8220;users&#8221; who will determine the junk and can push it to obscurity. That doesn&#8217;t solve the anonymity issue but helps control the junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

